standing by to help

If you or a loved one has been injured, now is the time to contact a team of proven lawyers. We offer free consultations via phone, email or video conferencing.

New Jersey Ethylene Oxide Lawsuit

2025 Update
People residing near three commercial sterilization facilities in New Jersey may have been exposed to a dangerous toxin known as ethylene oxide (EtO) through air emissions. Residents living near Linden, Franklin, and South Plainfield may have been exposed to ethylene oxide and developed certain types of cancer. Affected residents may be able to file a lawsuit against the plants responsible for the toxic emissions and their associated illnesses.

Exposure to EtO emissions has been linked with an increased risk of cancer. The gas is frequently used to sterilize food and medical devices but has been classified by the U.S. EPA as a human carcinogen. People who have been exposed to ethylene oxide emissions in New Jersey are taking legal action after developing certain types of cancer linked to EtO exposure.
In July 2022, the EPA announced that high levels of cancer-causing chemicals were found at EtO Sterilization Plant #2 located in Linden and the Cosmed facility located in Franklin. According to the EPA’s analysis, lifetime cancer risks exceeded the federal threshold of concern. Hundreds of lawsuits have been filed as a result of the harm caused by EtO emissions from these and other facilities. 

This page will cover the history of New Jersey ethylene oxide facilities, the potential health risks associated with exposure, the areas that may have been affected by EtO emissions, and the eligibility criteria to file a lawsuit against the owners of these plants.

Disclaimer: By consulting with Levinson Axelrod, P.A., we may refer your case to a specialist in the specific practice area, if necessary. Viewing this website or contacting our firm does not constitute an attorney-client relationship or a formal retention. All cases are subject to screening, and representation will only be confirmed through a signed retainer agreement. For contingency fee matters, the final fee may be determined by the Court.
Our team at Levinson Axelrod, P.A. can assist you through each step.
Call 323-EO-CLAIM (323-362-5246) or visit www.EOclaim.com to get started.

Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Facilities in New Jersey

The state of New Jersey is home to two ethylene oxide sterilization facilities owned by Cosmed Group Inc. and one facility owned by STERIS. The plants have come under scrutiny after the EPA released findings that nearby communities were potentially being exposed to cancer-causing toxins.

The facilities in question (EtO Sterilization Plant #2 in Linden, the Franklin plant operated by Cosmed of NJ, and the Isomedix plant in South Plainfield) each use ethylene oxide for sterilization processes. The Linden facility uses the known human carcinogen to sterilize spices and other food products, while the Franklin facility and South Plainfield facility use the gas to sterilize medical devices and equipment.

Who Qualifies to File a New Jersey EtO Lawsuit?

Individuals living near the sterilization sites in Linden, South Plainfield, and Franklin, New Jersey, may qualify for an ethylene oxide lawsuit if they develop certain cancers. However, it is imperative to consult with an attorney as early in the process as possible to ensure all eligibility requirements are met prior to filing. Surviving family members may be able to file a wrongful death lawsuit if a loved one passed away from an illness related to EtO exposure.

Eligibility requirements for filing a New Jersey EtO lawsuit:

Residency: Must have lived within 4 miles of an EtO sterilization site for at least one continuous year after its opening. Family members may also qualify. Workers at the facilities generally do not qualify, unless they also lived within a 4-mile radius.

Diagnosis: Must have been diagnosed with a qualifying cancer within the established latency period from the time of first EtO exposure. Qualifying cancers include:


  • Leukemia (minimum 5-year latency period)
  • Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (minimum 2-year latency period)
  • Multiple myeloma (minimum 2-year latency period)
  • Liver cancer (minimum 2-year latency period and must be a non- or light drinker and younger in age)
  • Lung cancer (minimum 2-year latency period and must a be non-smoker)
  • Breast cancer (minimum 5-year latency period)

Please note that people who worked at ethylene oxide plants may be able to file workers compensation claims if they develop diseases related to EtO exposure.

Speak With An Attorney
The hammer of justice
A skyscraper with a city on the background

EtO Usage and Emission Reports in Linden, South Plainfield, and Franklin, NJ

Data from the EPA shows that the sterilization sites located in Linden, South Plainfield, and Franklin emitted ethylene oxide, in some cases above EPA thresholds. Long-term exposure to ethylene oxide emissions has been linked with an increased risk of cancer, meaning that thousands of people are potentially at risk of serious harm. Individuals who reside in the communities surrounding the EtO facilities are encouraged to seek legal counsel if they have been diagnosed with a qualifying form of cancer.

EtO usage and emissions at sterilization sites located in Linden and Franklin, NJ:

  • Linden: Listed as one of the 23 commercial sterilization sites with ethylene oxide emission risks. The maximum risk level modeled by the EPA in 2022 showed a 2000-in-a-million cancer risk in the residential area nearest to the facility. In 2020, the site used 21.9 tons of EtO, according to the EPA. Emissions are controlled with a two-stage scrubbing system, but fugitive emissions may still degrade ambient air quality.
  • Franklin: EPA modeling in July 2022, showed elevated cancer risks exceeding 100-in-a-million. However, during a community presentation, the EPA announced that Cosmed had made improvements to the site that reduced emissions to below that elevated risk level. Exposure to EtO emissions over long periods is linked with an increased risk of breast and lymphoid cancer.
  • South Plainfield: EPA data shows the Isomedix plant has emitted ethylene oxide at various points between 1994 and 2024. Most of the 548,396 pounds of waste produced by this facility have been ethylene oxide.

In 2005, Cosmed entered into a $1.5 million settlement with the Department of Justice for violating the Clean Air Act. According to reports, the facilities are now in compliance but remain under scrutiny due to their chronic low-level EtO emissions. The sites have received a two-year extension to comply with new regulations under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP).

How Can I File a New Jersey EtO Lawsuit?

There is a specific legal process for filing a New Jersey EtO lawsuit. The best way to ensure that all steps are properly followed is by working with an attorney knowledgeable in ethylene oxide lawsuits. It is essential to consult with a lawyer as soon as possible to ensure that all eligibility requirements are met and that the case is filed within the statute of limitations.

Steps to file a New Jersey ethylene oxide lawsuit:

  • Consult with an attorney: The first step in an EtO emissions lawsuit is to consult with an experienced attorney. During the free case evaluation, your attorney’s team can help to determine whether you have a valid claim for compensation and how to move forward with a lawsuit. Our attorneys accept New Jersey ethylene oxide cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning there is no payment unless compensation is recovered on your behalf.
  • Establish exposure history: It is critical to establish exposure history, including showing that you lived within a 4-mile radius of the Linden, Plainfield, or Franklin facility for at least one year. An attorney can help to establish proof of residency and gather the documents needed to substantiate your case.
  • Submit proof of diagnosis: To qualify for an EtO lawsuit, you must be able to prove that you were diagnosed with a qualifying cancer. In order to do this, you will need to submit a comprehensive set of your medical records with proof of diagnosis.
  • File the lawsuit: With the necessary documents gathered, your attorney can then file your lawsuit in the appropriate jurisdiction. It is important to work closely with your attorney, allowing them to represent you throughout the legal process, including in settlement negotiations or a trial.

In 2005, Cosmed entered into a $1.5 million settlement with the Department of Justice for violating the Clean Air Act. According to reports, the facilities are now in compliance but remain under scrutiny due to their chronic low-level EtO emissions. The sites have received a two-year extension to comply with new regulations under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP).

What Is the Deadline to File a New Jersey EtO Lawsuit?

The statute of limitations in New Jersey for a toxic exposure case is typically two years from the date of the cancer diagnosis or the date when the victim could have reasonably discovered the EtO-related harm. However, New Jersey’s discovery rule may extend the amount of time a claimant has to file if they only recently became aware of the risks associated with ethylene oxide exposure. The statute of limitations (i.e., the amount of time a person has to file a lawsuit) is often complex. Failure to file within the legal deadline could result in a claim being denied. It is important to consult with an attorney as early in the process as possible to ensure prompt filing and that all of your legal rights are protected.

New Jersey EtO Settlement Amounts

When people settle with ethylene oxide sterilization facilities, the terms of their offers are not typically made public. So it is difficult to accurately portray settlement amounts received by New Jersey residents. It is estimated that New Jersey EtO settlements may range between $175,000 and $500,000, depending on the individual circumstances of the case. Factors, such as the type of cancer, provable medical costs, lost wages, and ability to substantiate exposure, may all play a role in determining the potential value of a case. Outcomes are expected to vary significantly and are determined on a case-by-case situation. One of our experienced attorneys can help you accurately estimate the potential value of an individual claim.

FAQs

What is the New Jersey ethylene oxide lawsuit about?

New Jersey ethylene oxide lawsuits are being filed against the owners of EtO facilities located in Linden, South Plainfield, and Franklin, where EtO emissions may put residents at an increased risk for developing certain kinds of cancers. Residents living near these sterilization sites who have been diagnosed with cancer are encouraged to contact an attorney as soon as possible.

EtO Sterilization Facility in Linden, NJ

Officially listed by the EPA as EtO Sterilization Plant #2, this ethylene oxide facility is located in Linden, New Jersey. It is one of the most scrutinized sites for EtO emissions in the country because of the large potential exposure area and past emission rates.

About EtO Sterilization, Inc. – Plant #2

Located at 2500 Brunswick Avenue in Linden, New Jersey, EtO Sterilization Plant #2 is owned and operated by Cosmed Group Inc. under its Food Pasteurization division. It has operated continuously since its opening in 1986. Reports indicate the facility utilizes ethylene oxide to sterilize spices and other agricultural items. Concerns over EtO emissions led to the installation of a two-stage scrubber system. However, residents living near the facility may still be at risk of exposure. The plant is located near densely populated areas, putting tens of thousands of New Jersey residents at an increased risk of developing certain kinds of cancer.

EtO Sterilization Facility in Franklin, NJ

The Franklin EtO facility is located at 19 Park Drive in Hardyston Township near the communities of Franklin and Hamburg Borough. It has been in operation since 1997, utilizing ethylene oxide to sterilize medical equipment. Original assessments of the plant by the EPA named it as a high-risk location, meaning individuals living near the facility may be at an increased risk of developing cancer when exposed to EtO emissions over a long period of time.

About Cosmed Group Inc. DBA

Cosmed of NJThe Franklin facility is currently owned and operated by Cosmed Group, Inc. and is doing business under the name Cosmed of NJ. Since it began operation in 1997, it has been owned by different companies. Although it was originally purchased by Cosmed, it was subsequently sold to another sterilization company before being re-acquired by Cosmed in 2017. Under the operation of Cosmed of NJ, the site is primarily used to sterilize medical devices. The facility currently uses a catalytic oxidizer system to reduce EtO emissions.

EtO Sterilization Facility in South Plainfield, NJ

Isomedix Operations, Inc. is located at 3459 South Clinton Avenue in South Plainfield. It is owned by the STERIS Corporation and goes by trade names such as Applied Sterilization Technologies, STERIS AST, and STERIS Isomedix. The plant has seven ethylene oxide sterilization chambers. The company uses ethylene oxide to sterilize medical devices, including:


  • Assembled complex devices
  • Catheters
  • Custom procedure packs
  • Equipment with integrated electronics
  • Multi-lumen tubing products
  • Stents
  • Wound care dressings

The South Plainfield plant’s emissions affect a number of residents. According to a letter sent from the EPA to the plant manager in 2021, 303,229 New Jersey residents live within a 5-mile radius of this facility, and 18,036 of those people were children under the age of 5. There were also 121 schools within a 5-mile radius of the facility. Children may be at an increased risk of dangers associated with ethylene oxide emissions because EtO is mutagenic. This means it can change the DNA in cells.

About Isomedix and STERIS
STERIS is a global gas-sterilization company with more than 60 locations worldwide. Their sterilization services use electron beam, gamma, X-ray, ethylene oxide, vaporized hydrogen peroxide, and steam technologies to safely sanitize various types of medical equipment. The Isomedix plant is only 12 miles from the Linden EtO sterilization facility.

EtO Sterilization Processes and Procedures in Linden and Franklin, NJ

The Cosmed Group facilities located in Linden and Franklin use ethylene oxide gas during their sterilization processes. Although the gas is used in sealed chambers, analysis from the EPA indicates that both sites have (or had) high levels of EtO emissions. At the Linden site, ethylene oxide is used to sterilize agricultural products such as spices, grains, and nuts. At the Franklin site, the gas is used to sterilize medical devices.



EtO Sterilization Processes in Linden, NJ



At EtO Sterilization Plant #2 located in Linden, NJ, ethylene oxide is used to sterilize food products, such as spices, nuts, and grains. Ethylene oxide is primarily used in the sterilization process because it is effective at killing harmful microorganisms on food products that cannot withstand steam or irradiation methods. High heat and moisture can damage the spices or other agricultural products, and ethylene oxide does not need high heat in order to sterilize.

Although the EtO sterilization process is completed in sealed chambers, studies show that gas can be emitted from the plant, polluting nearby communities. Ethylene oxide has been classified as a known human carcinogen, meaning exposure to the toxin can increase a person’s risk of developing certain kinds of cancer. The facility has installed scrubbers to help reduce EtO emissions.



EtO Sterilization Processes in Franklin, NJ



At the Franklin facility, operated by Cosmed of NJ, ethylene oxide is used to sterilize medical instruments, including surgical kits. The gas is used because of its high rate of efficiency in killing harmful microorganisms, making the products safe for use. However, EtO emissions have been linked with an increased risk of cancer, particularly when exposure occurs over a long period of time.

Catalytic oxidizers are used at the Franklin site to help control emissions; however, fugitive emissions can leak from vents, doors, and other areas, presenting a risk to nearby residents.

In 2024, the EPA announced that it would require commercial sterilization facilities to install enhanced pollution controls that would reduce emissions by up to 90%. The Trump administration has delayed compliance with these new rules by two years, meaning companies such as Cosmed have additional time to implement the changes that would help to significantly reduce the toxic gas being released into the environment.

Ethylene Oxide Linked to Certain Cancers in NJ Exposure Areas

Ethylene oxide is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the EPA due to its DNA-damaging qualities. EtO has been studied since the 1940s and has been linked with an increased risk of several kinds of cancer. It is believed that long-term exposure, even at low levels, can cause cancer. 

Cancers linked to ethylene oxide emissions:

  • Breast cancer
  • Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
  • Leukemia
  • Multiple myeloma


The dense population and urban layout surrounding EtO Sterilization Plant #2 in Linden and the Isomedix plant in South Plainfield exacerbate exposure risks. While, as of 2025, there have been no confirmed cancer clusters at these sites, regulatory agencies such as the EPA and New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection are using modeling to inform the public about the potential risks of EtO emissions and to help take action to reduce these risks.

Where are the ethylene oxide sterilization plants located in New Jersey?

Ethylene oxide sterilization plants are located at 19 Park Drive in Hardyston Township near Franklin Township, 3459 South Clinton Avenue in South Plainfield, and 2500 Brunswick Avenue in Linden, NJ.

Why is the Linden EtO facility considered high risk by the EPA?

The Linden EtO facility was considered high risk by the EPA because of its proximity to a densely populated area and the high rate of emissions. In 2022, EPA modeling suggested that nearby residents may be at a 2,000-in-a-million cancer risk level, strictly from EtO exposure.

What types of products are sterilized at the Linden and Franklin EtO facilities?

At the Linden EtO facility, ethylene oxide is used to sterilize agricultural products like nuts and spices. At the Franklin facility, the gas is used to sterilize medical equipment. At the South Plainfield facility, the gas is used to sterilize medical equipment.

How does ethylene oxide exposure increase the risk of cancer in New Jersey?

Ethylene oxide is a toxic gas that can damage DNA when inhaled. Studies show that prolonged exposure to EtO emissions can increase a person’s risk of developing certain kinds of cancer because of its mutagenic qualities.

What types of cancer have been linked to ethylene oxide exposure in New Jersey?

Cancers linked to ethylene oxide exposure include breast cancer, lung cancer, liver cancer, multiple myeloma, leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and lymphoid cancer.

How do I know if I lived close enough to qualify for a New Jersey EtO lawsuit?

Individuals living within a 4-mile radius of the Linden, South Plainfield, and Franklin facilities may qualify for a lawsuit. However, the best way to determine whether you qualify for an EtO lawsuit is by consulting with an attorney.

Can I still file a lawsuit if I moved away from Linden or Franklin years ago?

As long as you lived within a 4-mile radius of the facility for at least one continuous year after its opening, you may still qualify for a lawsuit even if you subsequently moved away.

What is the latency period for cancers linked to ethylene oxide exposure in New Jersey?

The latency period, or amount of time between exposure and diagnosis, for cancers in an ethylene oxide case is between two and five years, depending on the type of cancer.

Are former workers at the Linden and Franklin facilities eligible to file a claim?

Former workers at the Linden, South Plainfield, and Franklin facilities are generally ineligible to file a claim unless they also lived within a 4-mile radius of the sites. However, they may qualify for workers compensation claims.

Please contact our firm at 800-34-NJLAW to speak to one of our workers compensation attorneys.

What kind of compensation could I receive from a New Jersey EtO lawsuit?

Compensation in a New Jersey EtO lawsuit can vary significantly, depending on the individual circumstances of the case. The value of a claim depends on factors such as the type of cancer and amount of provable damages.

Do I need to pay legal fees upfront to file a New Jersey EtO lawsuit?

Cases are accepted on a contingency fee basis, meaning there are no upfront legal fees in a New Jersey EtO lawsuit.

What is the deadline to file a claim in New Jersey for toxic EtO exposure?

The deadline to file a claim in New Jersey for toxic EtO exposure is generally two years from the date of cancer diagnosis or the date from which it could have reasonably been discovered.

Your Neighbors,
your lawyers

Contact a New Jersey Ethylene Oxide Lawyer Today

Residents living within 4 miles of the Linden, Franklin, or Plainfield EtO sterilization facilities who have been diagnosed with cancer are encouraged to contact an attorney as soon as possible. Residents in nearby communities may qualify for compensation as a result of prolonged exposure to ethylene oxide and resulting illnesses. Affected individuals are encouraged to fill out an online contact form to schedule a free, no-obligation case review today. Our team is ready to support your case and fight for you.
For more information, please visit our dedicated landing page at www.EOclaim.com or call us directly at 323-EO-CLAIM (323-362-5246).
Get a Free Consultation
The hammer of justice

MEET OUR DEDICATED TEAM

Meet our local attorneys who take pride in serving their local communities
Meet Our Team
Francis J. Leddy, III
Partner
read more
Ronald B. Grayzel
Of Counsel
read more
James J. Dunn
Of Counsel
read more
Kendall Medway
Associate
read more
Ronald S. Yuro
Associate
read more
Shelby L. Falco
Associate
read more
Megan Coppa
Associate
read more
Marisel Lopez Chin
Associate
read more
Richard J. Levinson
Senior Shareholder
read more
Mark V. Kuminski
Managing Shareholder
read more
Richard J. Marcolus
Shareholder
read more
Brett R. Greiner
Shareholder
read more
Kimberly L. Gozsa
Shareholder
read more
Michael B. Fusco
Shareholder
read more
Todd D. Wachtel
Partner
read more
Robert Y. Cook
Partner
read more

Reviews & Testimonials

Celine took what I thought would be a stressful situation and turned it into a wonderfully positive experience for me and for my family. Her passion for her job, and her compassion towards her clients, is without limit. She is a fighter.
G.K
Celine took what I thought would be a stressful situation and turned it into a wonderfully positive experience for me and for my family. Her passion for her job, and her compassion towards her clients, is without limit. She is a fighter.
G.K
Celine took what I thought would be a stressful situation and turned it into a wonderfully positive experience for me and for my family. Her passion for her job, and her compassion towards her clients, is without limit. She is a fighter.
G.K
Everyone was excellent, caring and attentive. I felt like family. That's how comfortable everyone made me feel especially in a very difficult time in my life. Celine was professional and so emphatic to my situation and went above and beyond to make sure I was treated fairly and got what i so desperately deserved. Thank you so much.
S.C.
Rich Marcolus from Levinson Axelrod is one of the best professionals that I have ever worked with. He treated my small workmans comp case as though I was his number 1 client. I was always kept up to date during the entire process, and everyone in his staff treated me like family. I would highly recommend Rich Marcolus and the law firm of Levinson Axelrod to anyone in need of assistance with a workmans comp case.
C.C.
When I was injured on my job, I called Levinson Axelrod for advice on how to proceed with a Workers' Compensation Claim. I was referred to Mr. Todd D. Wachtel, whose professionalism shone through every step of the way. He was very supportive, caring, and attentive to detail. His patience with me and understanding of my situation made me comfortable and confident that I was being represented in the best possible way. Thank you Todd for all your hard work and for the resulting justified settlement. I will certainly recommend you to anyone needing a great attorney. Thanks again.
S.C.
My attorney Kim Gozsa handled my recent personal injury case as exemplary as she handled my prior case. She epitomizes what Most wish for when seeking the legal defense for a MVA. Always a top professional, strong advocate for justice and a bold negotiator. I can’t thank her enough for the fantastic litigation she provided on my behalf. In a word Kim is Awesome and I would recommend her to colleagues, family and friends without hesitation.
J.R.

case results

At Levinson Axelrod, We Don't Settle for Less
View All Results

$12,500,000

Medical Malpractice Settlement
The Levinson Axelrod, P.A. team obtained a $12.5 million dollar settlement on behalf of a client who was injured due to medical malpractice.

$7,000,000

Premises Liability Jury Verdict
A woman was putting her 3-year-old son on a carnival amusement ride while holding onto a portable fence when she received an electrical shock.

$8,000,000

Tractor-Trailer Jury Verdict
A 35-year-old laborer who resides in Kearny was seriously injured while working on the median of a highway when a passing tractor-trailer lost a wheel that struck him.

$987,000

Settlement
An Ocean County resident was injured when she tripped and fell on a depression in a parking garage located in Jersey City, suffering fractures of both ankles. The case was handled by Kelley Lavery of our office and settled during trial.

$6,000,000

Personal Injury Jury Verdict
A female drunk driver crashed into plaintiff’s vehicle causing multiple fractures to the right ankle and foot.

$3,500,000

Product Liability Jury Verdict
Worker injured by product defect on his commercial truck.

An Award-Winning Law Firm

Since 1939, our trial lawyers have been trusted by victims in a range of high-stakes claims and have earned a reputation for their expertise.
All Awards & Accolades